Advisors

The case for verticalizing your cloud services portfolio

April 28, 2021 by Hiral Chandrana Leave a Comment

We are living in a world that is becoming increasingly specialized, from how we consume information, to the brands we buy, to the resiliency in supply chains. This has become increasingly true post-pandemic as companies look to adapt and transform their business models. That focus on specialization is happening in cloud computing as well.

Industry-aligned cloud solutions and companies are taking the market by storm, so it shouldn’t be a surprise that the same is happening in cloud-focused professional services, where combining business process and industry expertise is critical to deliver innovations faster. If you are a cloud IT services firm who doesn’t have an industry-driven approach in your portfolio, you may be ignoring a critical path to delivering sustainable value to your customers.

If you are a cloud IT services firm who doesn’t have an industry-driven approach in your portfolio, you may be ignoring a critical path to delivering sustainable value to your customers.

In its 2021 State of the Cloud report, Bessemer Venture Partners predicts that “the vertical SaaS wave will become a tsunami” in the coming year. Veeva, a cloud-based CRM company focused on the life sciences industry, is perhaps the most cited example. With nearly $1.5 billion in annual revenue, Veeva continues to grow 33% year over year. Brightwheel, Procore, Majesco are just a few other vertically oriented SaaS companies. The larger cloud platforms (e.g. Salesforce, Microsoft, Adobe, AWS) have also been placing a larger emphasis on verticals over the past decade.

During the first two waves of cloud computing, software providers focused on building out their underlying platforms, leaving it to services partners and clients to customize and integrate them into industry-specific business processes. That worked well, but it leaves customers to finish the job — to manage and evolve those platforms to serve a business that is always changing.

In the cloud’s third wave, customers are looking for more help guiding them in the context of their business. That need is accentuated in regulated industries such as healthcare, financial services and government agencies that have specialized security requirements and risks. For example, a digital healthcare solution may require an operational transformation, analytics and workflow redesign, but it also needs a deep understanding of what patient/clinician engagement looks like across the value chain and how that aligns with HIPAA compliance.

Breaking the horizontal mindset

Specializing in one or two verticals is a smart move for almost any cloud-driven services firm. Unfortunately, many have been slow to adopt an industry-focused approach for a couple of underlying reasons. First is the assumption that you need to be at scale to verticalize. Many companies think they’re too small or simply don’t have the resources to do it well. The second revolves around fear. Fear that it requires significant effort without immediate ROI, or that they might pick the wrong industry, or that it will limit them in some way.

Let’s start with the scale issue. When consultancies get started, many begin with a more general approach to build their customer base and reputation with channel partners. The natural inclination for many founders, especially those who are technologists rather than industry experts, is to build up the firm around a specific platform or technical capability, rather than specializing in an industry. However with a generic approach, differentiation starts to diminish over time as more partners enter a space and there is a risk for services to be commoditized.

However with a generic approach, differentiation starts to diminish over time as more partners enter a space and there is a risk for services to be commoditized.

An interesting case study for verticalizing a portfolio is Onica, a cloud specialist in Amazon Web Services (AWS) consulting and managed services, which was a spin-off from a larger IT services firm. It delivered cloud migrations, big data and cloud-native development with a razor-sharp focus on AWS, but in parallel, also strengthened its competency in industrial and manufacturing oriented solutions with IoT and AWS. Onica was <$50 million at one point when it started focusing on industry solutions and grew 800% from 2016 to 2018. In late 2019, it was acquired by Rackspace for $323 million.

To alleviate initial fears, a vertical approach doesn’t have to be big-bang. A lesson from the above case study is the approach can be incremental and complementary to what a firm is already doing. For example, it may make sense to start with an industry-specific accelerator that speeds delivery or sets you apart in your go-to-market. Cloud vendors have made it a lot easier to create vertical IP and reusable assets by architecting their platforms to be more open and accessible. Or instead of building organically, consider a tuck-in M&A transaction to get the industry vertical expertise needed.

The bottom line is you no longer need the scale and resources of an Accenture or Deloitte to have a vertical play. It’s less about size, and more about having focus, picking the right vertical and partner(s) for that industry, and having confidence in your strategy.

When it comes to developing the right strategy, here are five areas where I recommend focusing your efforts: 1) Target your industry bets; 2) Align with your partners; 3) Co-create with customers; 4) Innovate at the intersections; 5) Tie your strategy to execution.

Target your Industry bets

Not all industries are created equal — like people they come in different sizes, and have different requirements, and not all will be the right match for you. The traditional approach is to look at the Total Addressable Market (TAM). David Kidder, CEO of Bionic and author of the book “New to Big” instead suggests looking at the Total Addressable Problem (TAP). According to David, “the TAP model is based on discovering brand new customer problems or uncovering new untapped markets and that can lead to exponential growth.”

The TAP model, disruptive trends, unique expertise, and industry micro-segmentation should all play a role in finalizing your industry bets. The goal shouldn’t just be to have an offering in the space, it’s to be positioned within the top three service providers for that particular vertical or micro-vertical.

Start by looking at your unique expertise, and the verticals or micro-verticals that are a fit for that expertise. A great example of this is Snowflake, the cloud data platform that allows businesses to unlock insight from data. Snowflake’s financial services solution provides a strict approach for security and regulatory compliance that can be tailored to the needs of customers in banking, insurance, or mortgages. It is the services partner’s role to implement, integrate and amplify the solution.

If you’re a cloud services firm aligned to Snowflake helping clients monetize the large amounts of data being generated in financial services industries, don’t stop at banking or insurance. Instead specialize further in micro-verticals such as consumer finance, commercial banking, life insurance or property & casualty insurance. Or think through how you can help clients create new fintech offerings that take advantage of the disruptions happening in eCommerce and cryptocurrency.

The TAP model, disruptive trends, unique expertise, and industry micro-segmentation should all play a role in finalizing your industry bets. The goal shouldn’t just be to have an offering in the space, it’s to be positioned within the top three service providers for that particular vertical or micro-vertical.

Align with your partners

The partner ecosystems for large cloud platforms have grown substantially in the last two decades. Salesforce alone has more than 1,600 services partners around the world. As cloud vendors look to expand market share, they are looking to consultancies to create industry-specific solutions that add stickiness to their platforms. To differentiate in an increasingly crowded space, more and more early-stage services firms are now leaning in on a vertical orientation.

If you are a service provider focused on a particular vendor’s platform, it’s important to understand that vendor’s vertical strategy. In most cases, they probably have one. If not, perhaps that’s an opportunity to add value or fill a gap in their go-to-market strategy. What industry roadmap has the cloud platform provider laid out for growth? How does that align with your strengths, customer base or future bets?

When ServiceNow first announced their industry bets, they started with financial services and telecom. As ServiceNow grew from IT service management to customer/employee workflows to AIOps, it has continued to build on its domain capabilities. The company now specializes in more than 10 industries, from healthcare to public sector to manufacturing to retail and logistics. In a statement last year, ServiceNow CEO Bill McDermott said, “by creating industry-specific solutions, delivered through a partner-led model, we can better address the unique challenges that companies in key vertical markets face.”

Co-create with customers

Picking one or two anchor customers can make a big difference in how quickly you can gain traction with a vertical strategy, and the positive reference that will help you get the next set of case studies and references. You might start with an existing customer or identify a customer to pursue in parallel with your vendor partner.

By working hand in hand with customers you will avoid the classic trap of a solution looking for a problem. The bottom line, make the customer part of the solution.

Whether you’re working alongside your cloud vendor partner or directly with the client, attach yourself to a strategic and well funded program. Many companies have roles solely focused on future innovations, titles such as Chief Digital Officer or Chief Growth Officer. Find a customer willing to wade into uncharted territories with you and co-create some intellectual property for an industry problem that hasn’t been solved or is just emerging.

Innovate at intersections

There will always be historic and economic events, such as the financial recession or recent pandemic, that drive new levels of innovation, but smaller disruptions shift markets all the time. It’s important to be on the lookout for signals and trends while betting on the future. For example, renowned futurist Amy Webb recently released the 2021 Emerging Tech Trends report and talks about health care as the next battleground for big-tech and how drone delivery will disrupt transportation & logistics industries.

Also, industry lines are blurring. This can be seen in retail solutions that create a connected consumer experience across various points in the shopper journey, or a media solution that engage audiences across channels, or a solution that provides banking customers with a consistent streamlined experience across different interactions. There is a lot to leverage across industries and in some cases it might make sense to build your differentiation/IP around a business process that cuts across 2-3 different industries. A classic success story is Adobe’s experience platform that can be tailored to provide personalized marketing solutions across various industries.

In the Salesforce economy, several services partners have focused on a cross-section of business processes like Configure-Price-Quote (CPQ) or eCommerce. In this example, partners could take it one step further and create a differentiated solution for B2B industries (e.g. manufacturing or hi-tech) where CPQ and commerce are integrated to drive business outcomes across the “Quote to Cash” value chain.

Whether it’s between industries, between business processes, or between technologies, innovation is amplified at the intersections.

We’re also seeing firms create use cases that incorporate and integrate big data, automation, or the disruptive application of 5G and AI across industries to differentiate. Whether it’s between industries, between business processes, or between technologies, innovation is amplified at the intersections.

Tie strategy to execution

Tying strategy to execution seems rather intuitive, but too many companies don’t go deep enough when laying out how they are going to be successful in this new space. An effective vertical strategy requires more than some IP or people with relevant skills. It requires an understanding of the unique sales and procurement processes within the industry, and an effective customer engagement model with top notch resources. How should your Go-to-Market plans (GTM) change, and what people and processes do you need to have in place, to pivot to a vertical focus?

Once you know that, find the right talent to build into that customer engagement model. In many cases, you might need to hire outside experts. People who have lived and worked in that industry, who understand the unique nuances, terminology, challenges, and opportunities in the space. In some cases, you might already have the right people and just need to cross train them through shadow or train the trainer programs.

As you progress and gain more customers in a given industry, or expand into new ones, you can grow your IP and build your team accordingly. Be prepared that results will not come overnight, but once you tie your holistic strategy to the execution plan, the potential upside can be exponential with the right bets and partnerships.

Conclusion

Taking a verticalized approach to a services portfolio isn’t a new concept. Large software companies have been pushing their services partners in this direction for more than a decade, and as cloud vendors mature they are following suit.

To compete in this market, third wave cloud consultancies will need to specialize in some way. While some may specialize in specific platform capabilities or at business process intersections, many can do it through an industry approach. In some cases, a hybrid strategy might be best. Whatever your strategy is today, you should be experimenting. You must be willing to work a year or likely more with the right investments before you see real ROI. You’re learning through the process, creating assets, repeatable practices, refining capabilities, etc.

To compete in this market, third wave cloud consultancies will need to specialize in some way. While some may specialize in specific platform capabilities or at business process intersections, many can do it through an industry approach.

A final thought: it’s good to start your journey with the end in mind, but remember, in the end, it is the journey that will matter. To be successful in the third wave of cloud, you will have to adapt quickly along the way, integrate new cloud technologies and business models to drive digital innovations for your clients. A salute to the non-profit organizations who worked tirelessly through the pandemic to protect and save lives.

Tercera’s best practices, playbooks and growth capital may be able to guide your success in this competitive environment, where differentiation now is more critical than ever. If you think Tercera can help, send the team a message here.

Tercera adds two new partners

April 8, 2021 by Tercera Team Leave a Comment

Former Guggenheim Partners Investment Banker Bill Petty, and Former Appirio CX and Marketing Leader Michelle Swan Join the Tercera Team

EVERYWHERE – April 8, 2021 – Tercera, a growth-focused investment and advisory firm specializing in technology professional services, today announced that Bill Petty and Michelle Swan have joined the firm as partners. Together, they bring decades of IT services experience to help Tercera drive forward the Third Wave of cloud computing. Bill and Michelle join Tercera CEO and founder Chris Barbin, partner Dan Lascell and partner Lisa Burton to support the firm’s investments in third wave cloud consultancies.

“Our goal at Tercera is to identify and empower the integrators, consultancies, and managed service providers who will lead the next wave of innovation,” said Chris Barbin, founder and CEO of Tercera. “Bill and Michelle have built, ran, advised and supported dozens of services companies over the last 20 years, and they bring pattern recognition for the opportunities and challenges our founders will experience as they scale their own business. They embody our mission and values, and will be invaluable partners to the entrepreneurs we back.”

About Bill

Bill brings more than 15 years of M&A experience to Tercera and will focus on the sourcing, execution and monitoring of Tercera’s investments. He joins Tercera from Guggenheim Partners where he was a Managing Director in the Technology Investment Banking Group. Prior to Guggenheim, Bill held investment banking roles with William Blair and City Capital Advisors and worked in KPMG’s Transaction Services Group. He has advised dozens of technology companies across the IT Services and Software markets on topics ranging from M&A, growth equity investments and IPOs. More on Bill here.

“Tercera is creating a new kind of investment firm, focused on the people that enable the third wave of cloud computing,” said Bill. “We are excited to partner with the founders and teams driving the next-gen IT services firms, and are confident that our counsel, connections and capital can help them become category defining leaders.”

About Michelle

Michelle brings to Tercera more than 20 years of branding, marketing and customer experience expertise. She will be responsible for guiding Tercera’s marketing, content and diversity & inclusion initiatives, the Tercera advisor and portfolio community experience, and helping founders amplify their own brand presence. Prior to joining Tercera, she founded and led Swancomm, a marketing communications consultancy supporting early stage product and services companies. Michelle was one of the earliest employees at Appirio, where she led corporate marketing, customer experience and initiated the company’s Customer Advisory Board. More on Michelle here.

“People-based businesses are the heart and soul of the economy, and the secret to success for some of the most well known technology companies out there. Yet they rarely get the attention and support they deserve. We aim to change that,” said Michelle.

About Tercera
Tercera is an investment and advisory firm founded to accelerate the growth of people-centric businesses. Specializing in the $460 billion cloud professional services market, the Tercera team is composed of invested operators who know first-hand what it takes to build and scale a successful cloud services business. Tercera (Spanish for ‘third’) is on a mission to identify the people and partners who will lead the next wave of cloud computing – the Third Wave – and provide them with the capital, counsel and connections they need to scale faster and take an outsized share of the market.

How services firms can architect a successful alliances program to fuel growth

March 17, 2021 by Gary Rinedollar Leave a Comment

If you were to ask a founder or CEO of a successful professional services firm what’s her or his secret to growth, most will say something along the lines of “hiring the right people” or “building a great company culture” or, for the more humble, “being in the right place at the right time.” Few would say “picking the right partners.” However, hitching your wagon to the right technology partners and building a mutually beneficial relationship with those partners, can mean the difference between growth and hyper-growth.

Having spent more than two decades leading sales, business development and M&A at product and services companies from HP to Appirio, I can tell you from first-hand experience that partnerships are the fuel for company growth.

Alliances help in so many areas. They can grow revenue by attracting new customers or broadening a company’s offerings. They can make you stickier inside an existing client, or help expand brand awareness and market presence. They can round out areas where you are weak (or where customers perceive you’re weak), and even speed time to market through joint innovation.

Unfortunately, too many companies treat their partnerships and alliances program in an ad hoc way, rather than as a strategic function of the business. Perhaps this is why 60-70% of partnerships fail to achieve what they set out to do. However, that doesn’t have to be the case. With the right strategy, selection criteria, structure, and success processes in place – what I call the four S’s – alliances can contribute greatly to your bottom line.

Craft Your Alliances Strategy

Whether you’re starting with a clean slate or have some partnerships in place (which is more often the case in my experience), you need a strategy.

Any good partner strategy starts with a strong understanding and alignment with your company goals and go-to market strategy. For example, is your goal to expand your market presence or build brand awareness? Or to broaden your product and services offerings? Or to shore up some perceived weaknesses?

If it’s to expand your market presence you’ll need to do due diligence and prioritize which markets to target, evaluate if a referral, reseller, OEM & distribution model fits your needs, estimate the resources required to support these channels and build a short list of potential partners.

If your goal is to become a specific technology or platform vendor’s top implementation or solution partner (or perhaps eventually be acquired by that vendor), your strategy might be to go all in on that one company.

If your goal is to be the leading systems integrator for a specific area (e.g. security, data analytics, IoT) or a specific industry (e.g. healthcare or financial services), your strategy might be to create partnerships across the entire stack of tech vendors within that space.

One example of this strategy in practice is BeyondID, a managed identity services provider in the identity access management (IAM) and cybersecurity space. BeyondID began by focusing on Okta, the leading cloud identity platform in the $55B identity market, managing some of their largest customers. The company has since formed partnerships with other cybersecurity and cloud vendors, expanding into new areas and revenue streams. Okta’s $6.5B acquisition of AuthO, an identity platform for application developers, opens up yet another opportunity.

No matter how many partnerships a company chooses to pursue — and I would argue that less is more — it’s important to remember all partnerships are not created equal. They can and should vary widely in importance, from those that you happen to interact with on a regular basis to those that are foundational to your corporate strategy.

Select the Right Partners for Your Strategy

Now that you’ve aligned your partner strategy with your company goals and go-to-market objectives, the next step is to find the right partners to help you meet those goals. Just like with employees, selecting the right partner(s) will set you on the right path.

First, define the criteria (internal and external) for your ideal partner. Here are a few questions to get you started:

How does the partnership fit within your corporate strategy?
How does the partnership align with your growth objectives?
How can the partnership expand or complement your current capabilities/offerings?
What is the partner’s position in the competitive landscape?
What is the partner’s geographic coverage & focus?
How mature is their partner ecosystem?
What level of support is the partner prepared to provide?

If you already have partnerships in place, review those existing relationships based on these criteria. What’s working, what’s not?

When identifying prospective partners, you want to pick clear leaders in their category. Start with a short list of three to four (unless there’s already a clear winner), and then do some diligence. This will take time but, trust me, it will be worth the effort.

Here are a few things I look for in the diligence process:

Are they a leader in their category as defined by revenue, marketshare, or analyst quadrants?
What is the partner’s total addressable market?
What is the partner’s growth rate?
Can I meet my growth/revenue goals in this ecosystem?
How crowded is their partner ecosystem with competitive companies/offerings?
Is there whitespace where my company can differentiate and be successful in the ecosystem?
Will my services rate structure/product pricing model be competitive in their market?
Do I have, or can I build executive alignment/relationships?
Is the partner willing to co-invest in the partnership?

The diligence process is meant to narrow down your choices, and to make sure you’re aligning with a partner that can bring real value to your company and customers. But from there it’s a courtship, with each side getting a sense for what it would be like to live together. These early discussions with partners are a chance to see if your values align, to get a feel for how they’d treat your customers and employees, and to more fully understand what they’re looking for out of the relationship. Like any marriage, you want to be with someone who sees value in what you bring to the table and will treat you with respect.

A partnership might not always be equal, but it should be balanced.

Consider a Three-Tiered Alliance Structure

A well-defined partner structure signals both internally and externally which partners are most important to your strategy. Too often I see partner pages littered with a large number of logos. In an attempt to illustrate market dominance and coverage, this to me just screams, “We really don’t have a partnering strategy, so let’s throw up a bunch of logos and hope for the best.”

What is meant to be a benefit to the company ends up being a distraction. Sales doesn’t know what to sell, marketing isn’t investing in the highest return campaigns, and delivery teams and/or engineering teams find themselves spending precious resources on solutions that will never be implemented. In the end, a lot of corporate calories are expended with little return.

One way to bring some structure and prioritize your partnerships is in a three-tiered system, organized like a pyramid.

At the top are your truly strategic alliances. This could be just two or three partners, but they are the ones your whole company will invest in. Sales and marketing teams will partner with them on key accounts and campaigns, engineering teams will collaborate on solutions, delivery teams will be trained on how to engage, etc. Strategic partners should be an integral part of your team, and will probably stick around longer than your biggest customers.

Next are solution partnerships, the ones that complement your strategics in some way and help you bring a more comprehensive solution to your customers. You’ll potentially have a few more of these than your top level strategic partners, but the number might still be fairly low. There will be investments made here, but not at the same level as with your strategics.

At the bottom of the pyramid are ecosystem partnerships, which might include dozens of companies. These are the partners that fill in a gap, are relevant in some way to your customer base or contribute to your go-to-market strategy. You’ll have to take a hard look at how to invest with these partners, if at all, but be clear about who they are and where they fit in the strategy. Sometimes they will graduate up into a higher level partnership, but in some cases they might remain just a small component of your larger offering.

There should be a different playbook for each level of partnership, and executives and employees should be aligned on their level of importance. Without that prioritization and alignment, you’ll end up with empty agreements that don’t add value, or teams wasting precious time and resources that would be better spent elsewhere.

Manage Your Joint Success

Alliances don’t manage themselves. They take time to nurture, structure to be effective, and ongoing focus and commitment to really see results. McKinsey has done some great research into what makes a successful joint partnership.

When it comes to managing the success of your partnerships, it helps to consider where your company is in its lifecycle. Small, early-stage services firms may utilize the crowd swarming methodology to partner management where the executives ‘own’ the relationship and spread the other functional relationship components off to sales, marketing, and delivery. This works for a while, but with senior leaders in start-ups wearing multiple hats, effectively managing these partners can either become a distraction (especially if there are multiple partners) or it doesn’t get the attention it requires. This can be especially true with large strategic partners. While these companies may accelerate your pipeline quickly, they can also drown you with activity. They may outnumber you by 1000:1 and may have a different sense of time and urgency.

Services companies that want to gain traction with large strategics and/or that are later in their lifecycle with more capital, should consider bringing on a dedicated alliances lead to add some method to the madness. Look for an alliances lead with a strong sales background who can help prioritize the organization’s resources and focus on driving business.

As the number of partners and activity grows, you’ll likely need to add additional alliances resources. One way to think about these hires is to do a value assessment of an additional sales headcount versus an additional alliances headcount. There are definitely scenarios where an additional alliances headcount with the go-to-market leverage of a strategic partner will drive significantly more pipeline than a more costly field sales person.

In closing, like any relationship, partnerships aren’t easy, but they are incredibly rewarding. For services firms, they really should be a core competency. If you find yourself without a well thought out plan in this area, or a website full of partner logos that are contributing little to nothing to your bottom line, I hope this guidance helps. If not, it might be time to seek some counseling from a professional.

Tercera launches to invest in people, not products

January 28, 2021 by Tercera Team Leave a Comment

Tercera Looks to Accelerate Technology Professional Services Businesses Specializing in the Third Wave of Cloud Computing

EVERYWHERE – Jan. 28, 2021 – Tercera, a new growth-focused investment and advisory firm specializing in technology professional services, launched today to accelerate consultancies and managed service providers in the $460 billion cloud services space. Tercera will put $225 million in equity capital to work building the next generation of cloud leaders, focusing on services firms that specialize in analytics, automation, data, security, enablement and management of cloud technology.

The company, which is led by a team of seasoned investors and advisors who are deeply ingrained in professional services, is on a mission to empower the people and businesses who make technology work. Spanish for Third, Tercera provides those leading the cloud’s Third Wave with the capital, counsel and connections they need to scale faster, do more and achieve outsized outcomes in today’s digital age.

CEO Chris Barbin founded Tercera based on his experiences as the co-founder and CEO of Appirio and his recent work as a Venture Partner at GGV Capital. Appirio, a pioneer in cloud services, was among the first enterprise services partners of Salesforce, Google, Workday and AWS. Barbin led Appirio to be one of the largest cloud consultancies before it was acquired in 2016 for $500 million. The Tercera team is seeking to help other services companies achieve similar success in a market segment that has been historically neglected by other investment firms.

“We believe the professional services space has been underserved by investors for too long, especially as it becomes clear just how important these partners are to customer adoption and market growth,” said Chris Barbin, founder and CEO of Tercera. “Cloud professional services is already a massive market opportunity, growing more than 20 percent year over year. With the pandemic driving more digital connections with customers, partners and employees, and enterprise cloud adoption happening faster than expected, we believe this market is poised for significant growth over the next few years.”

“Businesses rely on cloud computing like never before and it underpins so much of the innovation happening in technology, so it’s not surprising cloud professional services are booming on G2,” said Godard Abel, founder & CEO of G2, the world’s largest B2B tech marketplace. “Businesses are in dire need of systems integrators and managed service providers who can help them manage their increasingly large and complex cloud deployments, and yet the capital flowing into this space has significantly lagged investment in the technologies themselves. Tercera fills a gaping hole in this area, and we’ll be closely watching the firm’s portfolio in the coming years.”

Trilantic North America, a private equity firm that manages aggregate capital commitments of $9.7 billion, partnered with Chris to form Tercera, joined by a network of individual investors aligned with Tercera’s people-first vision. Tercera looks to partner with services firms that are founder-led, growth-focused and cloud-driven.

Tercera typically takes a minority stake in companies, investing between $5 million to $20 million of capital, selectively partnering with other firms and strategic investors as businesses scale. However, the company will provide more than just growth capital. It is also building out a services-oriented Advisor Network that will provide practical and diverse guidance and support to founders.

“Capital is only one component to growth,” continued Barbin. “Experienced guidance and a support network play an equal role in helping founders and teams scale faster and more gracefully than they could on their own. The Tercera Advisors are services professionals who have built, bought and sold services organizations, or run critical functions in services businesses. They bring the pattern recognition, diversity and playbooks that growth companies need.”

Useful Resources
Definition and players in the cloud’s Third Wave
Read Tercera’s people-first manifesto
Connect with Tercera on LinkedIn
Follow Tercera on Twitter at @TerceraCapital
Follow Tercera’s blog for news, trends and advice in cloud services

Empowering the people and businesses that make technology work

January 23, 2021 by Chris Barbin Leave a Comment

At Tercera we have a pretty simple mission: To empower the people and businesses that make technology work. “People” being the crucial word here.

Everyday we hear how technology is reshaping the world in profound ways — from the Artificial Intelligence in self-driving cars, to the Machine to Machine interactions (or IoT) responsible for our smart devices, to 3D printed hearts and homes, to the genome editing technology that made it possible to create a COVID-19 vaccine in months rather than years.

We pour trillions of dollars every year into advancing products and technology, but forget technology is of little value without the people who invent, design, develop, deploy, integrate, test, use, secure, manage and advance it.

So why is it that people-centric technology services firms (the integrators, consultancies, and managed service providers) get so little attention from the investment community?

Isn’t it surprising that the venture capitalists who pride themselves on identifying the next big thing overlook the fact that technology – especially information technology (IT) – rarely makes it big without talented people who have the special skills to put it to real use.

Over the last 25 years of building, leading and advising IT services organizations, I can’t tell you how many times VCs told me “why not stick with products?” or “sorry, we don’t do services.” When my co-founders and I were building Appirio in 2006 to capitalize on the then nascent enterprise cloud computing market, we heard “no thank you” from more than 25 different investment firms before Jim Goetz and Sequoia Capital took a bet on us. A bet that panned out when we eventually exited for $500M in 2016.

Services Doesn’t Suck

The IT services market is not small.

In fact, by 2021 it’s expected to be a $1T market (Grand View Research) and the outcomes for services firms are nothing to sneeze at. Just take a look at EPAM, an IT engineering services whose market cap at the time of this writing is more than $19B. Or the likes of Globant and Endava, next generation publicly traded services companies that trade at premium multiples unheard of for IT services companies just a few years back. There have also been plenty of impressive exits and mergers over the years for IT services companies. While they might not be at the same valuations and multiples as software companies with an 80% profit margin, the value of these firms has been steadily increasing as the war for engineering and IT talent rages on.

Here are a few more reasons why we believe services companies deserve a closer look:

They are undervalued relative to the often bloated valuations of software companies. Because so few investment firms seek out and truly understand the dynamics of professional services firms, and these firms can be self funded in some cases, competition for deals is less fierce. This means valuations haven’t been driven through the roof like product companies have.
They have a much easier path to profitability. Most IT services companies are profitable out of the gate because their “assets” can get to work right away. They don’t require years of development like a product might before they start bringing in revenue. And when demand and margins are high, many of them can actually throw off cash.
They require less capital investment. Series A funding rounds have grown steadily over the years, and as of January 2021 average about $25M according to some sources, whereas the average early stage round for services firms is much lower — namely for the reasons mentioned above.
They often have far more predictable, stable and non-linear revenue than investors expect. Services companies are thought of as unpredictable and lumpy by some, but with the right combination of customer retention strategies, embedded IP and managed services offerings this doesn’t have to be the case. These strategies can often drive growth that is non-linear to headcount additions, an often cited issue by the VC and PE community.

Plus, it’s just a lot more fun and rewarding to invest in people than 1s and 0s. In fact, I can think of no greater mission than one focused on people.

Services Businesses are Different

There are of course some fundamental differences between people-centric organizations and those built around products and technology.

For one, leadership, company culture, and having the right things in place to recruit, develop and manage talent is a much bigger priority in services companies where people are the key asset, unlike software companies. People aren’t binary the way code is, and talent (especially talent that is in high demand) has certain needs and expectations.

Then there are differences in how you plan and forecast, how you organize and enable sales, how you go-to-market and what elements of marketing you prioritize, and the importance of channels and alliances in how you scale. All of these areas look different in a people-centric organization compared to a product-centric organization, and they are constantly evolving. Especially as outcome-based pricing, pre-packaged IP, renewable services and vertical orientations gain steam.

I could go on, but my point is that different shouldn’t equal “bad” or “hard.” It’s just different. Once you appreciate those differences, you can hone investments, priorities and processes accordingly. The problem is that most VCs and PE firms have a playbook, and that playbook is optimized for product companies. Not people.

What Makes Tercera Different

When it comes to people-centric businesses, the Tercera team has learned a great deal about what works and what doesn’t over the last 30 years based on real-world experience. We are all services business veterans who have developed the pattern recognition it takes to know when it’s time to grow or time to slow, when to double down in a market and when to expand, and most importantly, what elements must be in place to scale a successful, sustainable business.

We’ve learned from our successes, but also from our mistakes. We believe it’s this insight, along with the industry connections we’ve built over the years, that can help the next generation of service businesses quickly grab market share, and build highly scalable businesses that go on to do great things.

We realize that there are thousands of investment firms out there, with more popping up every single day. Our goal is to make sure we aren’t like everyone else. That we offer something different, and do things differently. This is why “different” is one of our core values.

We don’t fit easily into a category. We’re a unique balance of venture capitalist and private equity, where we look to both build something new and make something more profitable and operationally sound. As former operators and entrepreneurs, we look at opportunities through those two mindsets — not just what looks good on a spreadsheet.

We realize that great founders with a great business can get capital from any number of sources. So while we are primarily an investment firm, we believe our real value is our services-centric counsel and connections we can provide, not only from our own experience but through our Advisor network as well.

Tercera’s Advisors aren’t a loosely connected group of people put together to fill up a website. It is a curated, highly experienced and invested community of professional services professionals who have walked in the shoes of our founders, or led critical functions within successful services businesses.

That focus, a core value for us, helps set us apart. Tercera is razor-focused on investing in people-centric technology businesses, however, our first fund is even more targeted on the $460B cloud professional services space. This, along with our real world experience in these spaces, allow us to go a mile deep rather than a mile wide, and make us infinitely more valuable and successful in our endeavors.

We also strive to have a different vibe than your traditional investment firm. While we take our work seriously, we try not to take ourselves too seriously. As a team, we’re pragmatic, approachable, honest, optimistic, and appreciative. In short, we’re fun (our last core value). We want to be the kind of team who you want to work with during these exciting times, people who you aren’t afraid to call when things go wrong and who you want to celebrate with when they go right. Because building a business might not be easy, but it should be fun.

This is who we are as a team, what we believe, and what you can depend on when you work with us.

Charting a course for the Third Wave of cloud consulting opportunities

January 20, 2021 by Jeff Kaplan Leave a Comment

I’ve been in the high-tech industry for almost 40 years and I’ve always been a ‘services guy’. That’s why when I saw Chris Barbin’s blog post announcing the soft launch of Tercera, he had me at “hello”. Let me give you a little historic perspective to explain why I think the founding of Tercera is so timely.

The Rise of IT Professional Services

I started my high-tech career in the 1980s as an industry analyst at IDC at the same time the computer and telecommunications industries were facing unprecedented disruptions. The introduction of the mini- and personal computers (PCs) fundamentally changed the way organizations acquired and utilized information technology (IT). And the divestiture of AT&T led to the deregulation of the telecommunications industry dramatically changing how organizations obtained voice and data communications equipment and services.

As I watched these industries quickly change, I also saw that the enterprises these computer and communications vendors served faced significant skills gaps. Gaps which limited their ability to quickly adopt the latest technological innovations and slowed the sales of new products. These skills gaps were being filled by a widening array of professional services firms, ranging from major companies, like Andersen Consulting, to local mom and pop consultancies. The escalating demands of these enterprises also fueled a boom in systems integration and outsourcing services that brought even greater attention to an increasingly influential group of global Professional Services (PS) firms – like CSC, EDS and Perot Systems – in the 1990s.

Dot.Com Era Spawns New On-Demand Services and Venture-Funded PS Firms

Rather than continue to sit on the sidelines as an industry observer, I decided to join a professional services start-up that was focused on filling a similar skills gap in the rapidly growing ‘internetworking’ segment of the market led by Cisco Systems. The company was called International Network Services (INS), and it caught the attention of three highly-regarded venture capital firms – Sequoia Capital, Canaan Partners and Sigma Partners – because it promised a higher rate of growth and profitability than traditional PS firms by combining highly repeatable project methodologies with software solutions derived from its various engagements. I became the director of strategic marketing and helped the company grow and gain industry recognition, go public, grow to over $300 million, and get acquired by Lucent Technologies in 1999 for $3.7 billion – over 12x revenues!

The 90s and the ramp up to Y2K not only sparked a surge in demand for IT professional services, like INS, it also spawned new ideas about how software functionality and computing power should be distributed and utilized. It was during the dot.com era that the idea of Application Service Providers (ASPs) and utility computing was born and caught the attention of VC and market research firms. However, the dot.com bust – along with the tragedy of 9/11 – caused the investors and industry analysts to abandon most of the early ASP and utility computing players.

Despite the demise of this segment of the market, I felt the idea of ‘on-demand’ services was going to regain its footing and attract renewed interest in the marketplace. And I made a big bet on this possibility by launching my own strategic consulting company, THINKstrategies, in 2001 to focus on the business implications of moving from physical, on-premise, packaged products to virtual, web-based, subscription services. Fortunately, Salesforce.com, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and a whole host of others gained success over the next decade to prove the viability and value of cloud-based solutions.

The First Wave of the Cloud Services Takes Hold In Departments Acquiring SaaS

Salesforce was one of the few companies that survived the backlash created by the dot.com bust and 9/11. And the early success of Salesforce and other Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) vendors represented the first wave of cloud computing. These SaaS vendors recognized there was increasing frustration among corporate end-users about the complexities and costs associated with traditional on-premise applications. They evangelized the virtues of SaaS primarily to address the specific needs of a single department – such as the sales department in the case of Salesforce.

Yet, what stood in the way of Salesforce gaining success wasn’t persuading sales professionals to give their new SaaS solution a try, it was helping them to quickly implement it within the broader department to prove its value to the business, not just a few individuals. The major PS firms weren’t ready to focus on this embryonic market opportunity, so a new generation of start-up consultancies, including companies like Bluewolf, emerged to fill the gap and help accelerate the deployment of the first round of department-centric SaaS solutions.

The major PS firms weren’t ready to focus on this embryonic market opportunity, so a new generation of start-up consultancies, including companies like Bluewolf, emerged to fill the gap and help accelerate the deployment of the first round of department-centric SaaS solutions.

The Second Wave of the Cloud Services Washes Across the Enterprise with IaaS and PaaS

The second wave of cloud consultancies appeared in the market as the concept of SaaS gained acceptance among companies large and small, and gave companies like Amazon confidence to apply the same pay-as-you-go model to the compute and storage side of the tech marketplace. Amazon Web Services (AWS) basically resurrected the utility computing idea of the Dot.Com era and ignited the Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) market opportunity.

Once again market acceptance and adoption were slow at first because the economic drivers weren’t fully in place and a skills gap still existed. The financial crisis of 2008 created the economic imperative for enterprises to look for new ways to cast aside their capital-intensive data centers of the past in favor of more flexible and economical cloud services. That new sense of urgency brought on by the financial crisis also forced many enterprises to turn to PS firms for help leveraging IaaS – along with Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) – across their operations.

This second stage of cloud growth was not only predicated on application and department specific skills, but on enterprise-wide integration service capabilities to pull the solutions from various ISVs and other cloud providers together. A new wave of cloud-centric consultancies, including Appirio, that were helping the leading vendors capitalize on the rapidly expanding cloud opportunities.

Appirio Venture Funding Opens New Chapter of Cloud Services

I became friends with Chris Barbin shortly after he, Narinder Singh, Glenn Weinstein, and Mike O’Brien founded Appirio. Chris and Appirio caught my attention when the company received venture funding from Sequoia Capital, an accomplishment which only occurred occasionally since my days at INS. And when I saw it was another alum of INS, Jim Goetz, who was responsible for Sequoia’s bet on Appirio after Salesforce did the same, I knew this would be a new cloud consulting firm worth paying attention to. So, I reached out to Chris because I was one of the few independent analysts focused on the rapidly evolving professional services side of the cloud computing marketplace and interested in Appirio’s go-to-market strategy.

Chris and Appirio caught my attention when the company received venture funding from Sequoia Capital, an accomplishment which only occurred occasionally since my days at INS..I knew this would be a new cloud consulting firm worth paying attention to.

As it turned out Appirio’s strategy echoed many of the elements I had seen pioneered at INS. First, it was aligned with a major vendor – Salesforce. Second, it was providing a combination of rapid deployment and sophisticated integration services. And third, it was developing a highly repeatable methodology and productizing its solutions to give it greater scalability and profitability that made it appealing to investors.

The success of Salesforce and AWS attracted more competitors and created greater demand for multi-vendor integration services to not only successfully deploy the cloud alternatives and ensure they were being properly utilized. Appirio was in a great position to capitalize on this opportunity.

Strategic Acquisitions Prove Value of Cloud PS Investments

In addition to filling an important skills gap, professional services firms are the ‘trusted advisors’ for many enterprise decision-makers. As a result, they have helped drive significant revenues to cloud vendors. In fact, IDC estimates PS firms have sourced nearly two-thirds (64%) of the $1.2 trillion market opportunity in the Salesforce ecosystem alone.

In addition to filling an important skills gap, professional services firms are the ‘trusted advisors’ for many enterprise decision-makers. As a result, they have helped drive significant revenues to cloud vendors.

Although the first wave of cloud-oriented consultancies didn’t attract a significant amount of venture funding, it did create good exits among major ISVs, PS firms and other vendors seeking to augment their internal capabilities. For instance, Bluewolf was acquired by IBM for $200 million. And another fast-growing cloud consultancy, Cloud Sherpas, was acquired by Accenture for $350M-$400M. As Appirio became a market leader during this second wave of the cloud it too achieved an impressive exit when it was acquired by Wipro for $500M in 2016.

While these may have been the most prominent PS firm exits in the first two waves of the cloud, there were plenty of other PS acquisitions that didn’t get as much attention. In fact, the pace of acquisitions in the Salesforce ecosystem alone has accelerated over the past 2-3 years, and the assortment of ISVs and other vendors making these acquisitions has dramatically expanded as a list compiled by Channele2e shows.

PS firms continue to add cloud consultancies to their operations at a pretty fast clip, including IBM which most recently acquired Salesforce consultancy 7Summits. The ISVs themselves are making more and more strategic acquisitions as well. This includes Salesforce, which most recently acquired Acumen solutions and has seeded the entire market with investments in more than 50 service firms over the years through its Salesforce Ventures arm.

This latest flurry of acquisitions has not only validated the value of cloud consultancies but has created a need for a new generation of PS firms to address the escalating demands produced by the pandemic and the latest technological advancements.

Welcome to the Third Wave of Cloud Consulting Opportunities

Few enterprise executives have to be educated about what the cloud is or why it’s important anymore. And they don’t have to be convinced about the viability or value of cloud-based solutions, especially as a result of the global pandemic. They now need help answering where and how to take the greatest advantage of the power of the cloud to meet their particular corporate requirements and objectives.

If the first wave of the cloud was centered around departmental requirements like CRM to satisfy sales teams, and the second wave was focused on enterprise-wide data center migration and application integration needs – then the third wave of the cloud is aimed at extending the power of SaaS, PaaS and IaaS to support escalating inter-enterprise requirements at a global scale.

The third wave of the cloud is aimed at extending the power of SaaS, PaaS and IaaS to support escalating inter-enterprise requirements at a global scale.

While many organizations responded to the dramatically different demands of the global pandemic admirably to connect their employees remotely and accommodate their customers electronically, the systems that they quickly put in place still need a lot of work to ensure their ongoing viability.

Although everyone is looking forward to returning to some form of normalcy once vaccines push back on the coronavirus, most organizational leaders recognize that the way we work, shop, and interact has changed forever. Businesses and other institutions will become even more reliant on the Internet (i.e. the Cloud) to support their employees, customers, and partners. In fact, we’re entering an era in which most organizations will rely on multiple cloud providers to support various requirements.

And every enterprise will need to augment their in-house teams with external resources to meet these escalating multi-cloud needs. In fact, the demand for PS help will grow because most enterprises will be keeping tight reins on their internal operating budgets and be seeking outside expertise to help them fortify, extend, and transform their newly digitized business processes.

In fact, the demand for PS help will grow because most enterprises will be keeping tight reins on their internal operating budgets and be seeking outside expertise to help them fortify, extend, and transform their newly digitized business processes.

The population of new cloud consultancies will also expand to surround a broader array of strategic vendors. Salesforce, AWS and Microsoft have attracted much of the attention of cloud consultancies in the past. As other cloud vendors gain success – like Workday, ServiceNow, Twilio, Snowflake and Okta – they will also need independent cloud consultancies to help their customers adopt their solutions and expand their market opportunities.

I’ve always believed that the ultimate irony about the rapid rise of the “cloud” is that it has grown because it promised a simpler and more economical method of obtaining compute power and software functionality. Yet, in reality it has compounded the complexities, and costs for many organizations because it adds another layer of complications to the on-premise applications and data center operations already in place. You can see a clear illustration of this stark reality – during ‘normal’ times – when you enter the exposition hall of the Dreamforce conference and are immediately confronted with the largest professional services firms situated in the biggest booths at the front entrance to the event.

Organizations of all sizes – and cloud vendors of all types – need professional services firms with varying skills to make cloud solutions work in real-world environments. As a ‘services guy’, I’m excited about the additional opportunities for PS in the third wave of the cloud, and the investment opportunities for Tercera in the coming decade. I look forward to them identifying and building that next generation of cloud consultancies.